Robotic-Assisted Vitoretinal Surgery
- incisionary
- Feb 7
- 2 min read
Updated: Feb 16

Surgery involving the retina has entered a new phase thanks to robotic assistance, especially when dealing with intricate conditions at the back of the eye. Measured in tiny fractions of a millimeter, retinal layers require movements so exact that even slight hand shaking becomes a problem. Since natural hand vibrations often reach about 100 micrometers, they interfere with tasks needing less than 10-micrometer precision. Machines built for these operations reduce human physical limits by smoothing out involuntary motion. Precision shifts dramatically once mechanical steadiness replaces biological variability.
Usually, vitreoretinal procedures deal with issues like macular holes, epiretinal membranes, detached retinas, or problems tied to diabetic eye disease. In standard practice, doctors perform pars plana vitrectomy, guiding tiny tools by hand through an operating scope offering strong magnification. Even though results tend to be good, specific steps - including removing thin layers from the retina or delivering fluid beneath it - demand extremely precise control, testing the limits of even well-trained hands.
Starting with precision, robotic aids such as those developed by Preceyes BV refine movement through scaled translation - large motions become tiny, controlled shifts inside the eye. Because human hands shake slightly, built-in software filters out these micro-tremors during delicate phases. Instead of relying solely on touch, certain devices relay resistance data back to the surgeon via haptic cues. This responsiveness helps prevent undue pulling on fragile layers at the back of the eye. Though not perfect, their presence tightens control where accuracy matters most.
A single pioneering human trial, reported in Nature Biomedical Engineering, found robotic support improved precision during eye surgeries like membrane removal and vein access. Though early, results suggest machines can hold tools steadier than hands alone. Such control might allow new treatments - for example, threading vessels to deliver therapies directly to retina tissue - approaches too difficult without advanced tools. Procedures once out of reach could become routine if refinement continues at current pace.
Still, challenges persist. Though initial investment is steep, installation periods drag on - surgeons face a tough adaptation process too. For seamless use, adjustments within current surgical routines become necessary. Over time, evidence on financial benefits continues to unfold.
Even with existing hurdles, progress in robotic-assisted vitreoretinal procedures mirrors a growing emphasis on targeted treatments and delicate surgical methods. With ongoing innovation - especially systems using machine learning to guide movements through real-time imaging - new possibilities could emerge for operating inside the eye. In time, machines are likely to support surgeons more than substitute them, refining accuracy without overriding professional decision-making.
Written by Aniket Kumar Sinha at Incisionary
References
Edwards et al. (2018) – First-in-human robotic retinal surgery https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6155489/
Roizenblatt et al. (2018) – Robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery: current perspectives:
Jacobsen et al. (2019) – Robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery increases precision and limits tissue damage:
Willekens et al. (2017) – Robot-assisted retinal vein cannulation in an in vivo porcine model:
Gonenc et al. (2016) – Robot-assisted retinal vein cannulation (Micron vs SHER):



Comments