Post-Operative Infections Under the Microscope

Regardless of how routine or advanced a surgical procedure may be, infection remains one of its most feared complications. Every operation creates an opening in the body’s natural defenses, and even under the most sterile conditions, microbes can find their way in. When infection spreads and the body’s response spirals out of control, the result is sepsis. Sepsis is not just a worsening infection; it is a life-threatening condition where the immune system’s reaction damages the very organs it is meant to protect. Around the world, sepsis continues to be one of the leading causes of death after surgery, responsible for millions of lives lost each year.

Sepsis develops when bacteria, fungi, or other pathogens enter the bloodstream and trigger widespread inflammation. This can happen in several ways after surgery. The most common source is a surgical site infection, where bacteria colonize the wound or deeper tissues. In abdominal surgery, a leak from the intestines can release bacteria into the abdominal cavity, setting off a rapid chain of infection. Devices used in recovery add another layer of risk. Catheters inserted into the bladder, central lines placed into veins, and ventilators used for breathing support are lifesaving tools, but they are also entry points for bacteria. These device-associated infections are among the most common hospital infections and a frequent source of sepsis. They can spread quickly because the bacteria often form biofilms, which are protective layers that make them resistant to antibiotics. Post-operative patients are also vulnerable to pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and bloodstream infections unrelated to the surgical site but are worsened due to the weakened state of the recovering body.

Not every patient faces the same likelihood of sepsis. Advanced age, diabetes, poor nutrition, immunosuppression from chemotherapy or steroids, and prolonged or emergency operations all increase risk. These risk factors make close monitoring essential, yet they also complicate recognition because the symptoms of early sepsis can mimic normal post-surgical recovery.

Detecting sepsis early is one of the greatest challenges doctors face. The early signs—fever, increased heart rate, shortness of breath, or confusion—can easily be mistaken for normal post-surgical recovery. A patient who is tired or slightly disoriented may simply appear to be recovering from anesthesia, when in reality, sepsis may already be developing. Doctors use a combination of clinical observation and laboratory tests to try and detect sepsis. Blood cultures are essential for identifying the organism responsible for the infection, although the results take time. Imaging studies, such as CT scans or ultrasounds, are often needed when the source of infection is hidden, as in cases of abscesses or bowel leaks.

Doctors also rely on scoring systems to standardize diagnosis. The older SIRS criteria focus on inflammation but are often too broad. The SOFA score evaluates organ function, while the quicker qSOFA score provides an at-the-bedside screening tool using three measures: respiration rate, blood pressure, and mental status.

The most important step to treat post-operative sepsis is to start antibiotics quickly, often before the specific cause of infection is even known. General antibiotics are given immediately, and once laboratory tests identify the responsible bacteria, diagnosis is adjusted to target the infection more precisely. However, antibiotics alone are not enough, and the source of infection must be eliminated. Alongside this, supportive care is critical. IV fluids are used to maintain blood pressure, and if fluids are not sufficient, medications called vasopressors help keep blood circulation stable. Oxygen therapy or mechanical ventilation may be required for breathing difficulties, and dialysis would be used if the kidneys fail.

Despite these measures, sepsis remains deadly. What makes it so difficult is that its progression can be rapid and unpredictable. A patient can go from stable to critical condition within hours. This is why hospitals emphasize prevention as much as treatment. Preventive strategies start before the first incision is made. Patients are often given prophylactic antibiotics to reduce the risk of infection, and strict sterile techniques are followed throughout surgery. Afterwards, careful monitoring of wounds, minimizing the use of invasive devices, and encouraging early mobilization all reduce the likelihood of infection. Protocols such as Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) have been shown to lower complication rates by focusing on nutrition, pain control, and early activity.

Globally, sepsis affects over 49 million people each year and contributes to nearly 11 million deaths. In high-income countries, advanced intensive care units and rapid diagnostics have improved survival, but even there, sepsis remains a leading cause of hospital deaths. In low and middle-income countries, the challenge is even greater. Limited access to sterile equipment, antibiotics, and critical care makes post-operative infections harder to prevent and harder to treat. The World Health Organization has highlighted sepsis as a global health priority, calling for better infection prevention in hospitals and faster recognition of sepsis when it occurs. Where these measures have been put in place, deaths have significantly declined.

Written by Shanisse Tan at Incisionary

APA References

Brook I. (2008). Microbiology and management of abdominal infections. Digestive diseases and sciences, 53(10), 2585–2591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-007-0194-6

Cheadle W. G. (2006). Risk factors for surgical site infection. Surgical infections, 7 Suppl 1, S7–S11. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2006.7.s1-7

Mayr, F. B., Yende, S., & Angus, D. C. (2014). Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Virulence, 5(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.27372

Rudd, K. E., Johnson, S. C., Agesa, K. M., Shackelford, K. A., Tsoi, D., Kievlan, D. R., Colombara, D. V., Ikuta, K. S., Kissoon, N., Finfer, S., Fleischmann-Struzek, C., Machado, F. R., Reinhart, K. K., Rowan, K., Seymour, C. W., Watson, R. S., West, T. E., Marinho, F., Hay, S. I., Lozano, R., … Naghavi, M. (2020). Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet (London, England), 395(10219), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7

Singer, M., Deutschman, C. S., Seymour, C. W., Shankar-Hari, M., Annane, D., Bauer, M., Bellomo, R., Bernard, G. R., Chiche, J. D., Coopersmith, C. M., Hotchkiss, R. S., Levy, M. M., Marshall, J. C., Martin, G. S., Opal, S. M., Rubenfeld, G. D., van der Poll, T., Vincent, J. L., & Angus, D. C. (2016). The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 315(8), 801–810. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287